Automated Runbooks for CDN/DNS Outages: Code-First Playbooks for Ops Teams
Turn manual CDN/DNS runbooks into automated, code-first playbooks—Terraform and Ansible examples to purge caches, failover DNS, and reroute traffic.
Hook — Your ops team is drowning in manual steps during CDN/DNS incidents
When Cloudflare, AWS, or other global CDN/DNS providers hiccup, the first 15 minutes determine whether you mitigate damage or fight a multi-hour outage. In January 2026 we saw large-scale reports of X and site outages tied to CDN/DNS failures; those incidents exposed an ugly truth: runbooks written as PDFs or wiki pages turn into frantic, error-prone checklists during an incident.
This guide shows how to convert those paper runbooks into code-first automated playbooks — Terraform for declarative DNS/CDN changes, Ansible and scripts for operational steps, and lightweight CI automation to execute failover safely. You’ll get copy-pasteable examples to automate DNS failover, purge caches, and reroute traffic so your team can reduce toil and act fast.
Why code-first runbooks matter in 2026
Two trends changed how we handle CDN/DNS incidents by 2026:
- Event-driven automation: Ops teams integrate monitoring events (synthetic checks, RUM errors, provider status pages) into pipelines that automatically trigger runbooks.
- GitOps for runbooks: Runbooks as code in source control with CI approvals replaced manual copy/paste and gave teams auditable, reversible changes.
Combined with multi-CDN strategies and provider-origin failovers, these trends let you respond in minutes instead of hours.
What this article delivers
- Concrete IaC examples (Terraform) for DNS failover patterns
- Ansible playbooks and shell snippets to purge CDN caches and update origins
- A safe incident automation workflow (CI/approval/rollback)
- Testing, safety and operational guidance tuned for 2026 realities
High-level incident flows (practical playbooks)
Here are three common, high-confidence flows you should support with automation:
- DNS failover: Update DNS records to point traffic to a backup origin or alternate CDN using low TTLs and health checks. (See also migration and sovereignty considerations when you move zones or record control.)
- CDN purge + origin swap: Purge CDN caches and switch CDN origin settings to an unaffected origin or S3 bucket.
- Traffic reroute: Use weighted DNS or CDN traffic steering to send a fraction of traffic to an alternative stack for progressive validation; combine this with edge caching and steering strategies to minimize latency impact.
Core design principles
- Automate the repetitive, not the judgement: require human approval for global failovers; automate cache purges and DNS updates on approved flows.
- Short TTLs by default in incident mode: prepare records with 60s–120s TTLs so failovers propagate fast when needed.
- Idempotency: make every change safe to re-run; use declarative IaC when possible.
- Observability: tie runbook steps to synthetic checks and rollback triggers and surface them in your operational dashboards.
Example 1 — Terraform: Route53 failover using health checks
Use AWS Route53 failover routing or weighted records. Below is a minimal Terraform example that declares a primary and secondary A record with a health check. When the health check fails for the primary, Route53 can fail traffic to the secondary.
provider "aws" {
region = "us-east-1"
}
resource "aws_route53_health_check" "primary_origin" {
fqdn = "primary.example.com"
port = 443
type = "HTTPS"
resource_path = "/healthz"
failure_threshold = 3
request_interval = 30
}
resource "aws_route53_record" "primary" {
zone_id = var.zone_id
name = "www.example.com"
type = "A"
ttl = 60
records = [aws_instance.primary.public_ip]
set_identifier = "primary"
failover = "PRIMARY"
health_check_id = aws_route53_health_check.primary_origin.id
}
resource "aws_route53_record" "secondary" {
zone_id = var.zone_id
name = "www.example.com"
type = "A"
ttl = 60
records = [aws_instance.secondary.public_ip]
set_identifier = "secondary"
failover = "SECONDARY"
}
Notes:
- Use short TTLs (we used 60s) during incident windows. For normal operations, higher TTLs are OK.
- Keep secondary origins warm (a scaled-down cluster or edge-serving S3) to accept traffic.
Example 2 — Cloudflare CDN purge and origin switch (Ansible + Curl)
During CDN incidents you often need to both purge caches and update the CDN origin to bypass a bad upstream. Below is an Ansible playbook that calls Cloudflare's API to purge the cache and update the origin pool. Replace variables with your credentials and zone ID.
# ansible-playbook purge-and-update-origin.yml
- hosts: localhost
gather_facts: false
vars:
cf_api_token: "{{ lookup('env','CF_API_TOKEN') }}"
zone_id: "REPLACE_ZONE_ID"
purge_urls:
- "https://www.example.com/*"
new_origin: "backup-origin.example.com"
tasks:
- name: Purge Cloudflare cache
uri:
url: "https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/{{ zone_id }}/purge_cache"
method: POST
headers:
Authorization: "Bearer {{ cf_api_token }}"
Content-Type: "application/json"
body: "{\"purge_everything\":true}"
status_code: 200, 201
- name: Update origin pool (simplified)
uri:
url: "https://api.cloudflare.com/client/v4/zones/{{ zone_id }}/load_balancers/pools/YOUR_POOL_ID"
method: PATCH
headers:
Authorization: "Bearer {{ cf_api_token }}"
Content-Type: "application/json"
body: "{\"origins\": [{\"name\": \"backup\", \"address\": \"{{ new_origin }}\", \"enabled\": true}], \"check_regions\": []}"
status_code: 200
This playbook:
- Purge Cloudflare caches completely (use targeted URL lists when possible to reduce blast radius).
- Updates a load balancer pool to point to a backup origin.
Example 3 — CloudFront invalidation + Route53 switch (bash + AWS CLI)
If you use AWS CloudFront, invalidation and Route53 updates are common steps. Here’s a compact script that performs a CloudFront invalidation and updates one DNS record atomically using change-resource-record-sets.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
DISTRIBUTION_ID=E1ABCDEF123456
ZONE_ID=Z123456ABCDEFG
RECORD_NAME=www.example.com
BACKUP_IP=3.4.5.6
# 1) Create CloudFront invalidation
aws cloudfront create-invalidation --distribution-id $DISTRIBUTION_ID --paths "/*"
# 2) Update Route53 record to point to backup IP (atomic change)
cat > change-batch.json <
Safe execution patterns (approval, dry-run, and rollback)
Automation must be safe. Use this three-stage approval model in your CI/CD incident pipeline:
- Dry-run: Terraform plan or Ansible check mode. Synthetic checks run and report expected impact.
- Approval gate: A human approves via Slack/Jira/PR comment to trigger the execution job. For regulated teams consider aligning approval controls with your compliance posture (see FedRAMP and platform procurement notes at what FedRAMP approval means).
- Execute + monitor: Run the playbook; monitor synthetic checks and RUM for 3–10 minutes. If errors increase beyond thresholds, auto-rollback.
Terraform dry-run and apply in incidents
Keep a pipeline job that runs terraform plan and posts the plan to the incident channel. The apply step should require approval. Example concisely:
# CI step: plan
terraform init
terraform plan -var='incident=true' -out=tfplan
# Human reviews UI artifact, then approves
terraform apply tfplan
Progressive traffic steering: reduce blast radius
Instead of flipping all traffic, use weighted DNS or CDN steering to shift a percentage to the backup origin. This lets you validate backup health with production traffic. Combine weighted records with your edge caching strategy to limit cache churn and latency.
resource "aws_route53_record" "prod_weighted" {
zone_id = var.zone_id
name = "www.example.com"
type = "A"
set_identifier = "primary-90"
weight = 90
ttl = 60
records = [aws_instance.primary.public_ip]
}
resource "aws_route53_record" "backup_weighted" {
zone_id = var.zone_id
name = "www.example.com"
type = "A"
set_identifier = "backup-10"
weight = 10
ttl = 60
records = [aws_instance.secondary.public_ip]
}
Testing your automated runbooks — don’t wait for an outage
Schedule failure drills (monthly or quarterly) and runbook run-throughs. Key steps:
- Simulate primary origin failure with a synthetic monitor that returns 500 for 3+ checks.
- Run your Terraform/Ansible playbooks in a staging zone or with subdomains, then examine propagation and rollback speed.
- Use chaos engineering for more advanced teams to inject CDN/DNS faults in a controlled manner — pair these drills with data and pipeline hygiene guides such as ethical data pipelines so test telemetry is usable and auditable.
Security, RBAC, and auditing
Treat runbook triggers like code deployments.
- Use short-lived credentials (OIDC, IAM roles) from CI and platforms (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) to avoid long-lived secrets.
- Restrict who can approve incident runbooks. Use separate reviewers for DNS changes and for CDN purges if possible — integrate identity and verification tooling similar to vendor assessments described in identity verification vendor comparisons.
- Log every change — Cloudflare/AWS provide audit logs. Store CI artifacts and the exact payloads for post-incident review.
Operational considerations and pitfalls
- DNS caching: Even with 60s TTLs, some resolvers ignore TTLs; expect a small fraction of users to be cached longer.
- Rate limits: CDN APIs and providers throttle purges or changes; batch where possible and prefer targeted purge lists to global invalidations.
- Cold caches: Rerouting creates cold cache traffic to the backup origin; ensure cost/scale limits are acceptable.
- Provider-specific behavior: Cloudflare proxied records change CNAME behaviors. Test how your DNS provider and CDN interact before relying on an automated switch.
Advanced strategies for 2026 and beyond
As of 2026, teams are adopting these higher-maturity patterns:
- Policy-as-code: Enforce safety policies (e.g., require TTL <= 120s during incident mode) with tools like Open Policy Agent in your CI pipeline; tie those rules into procurement and platform compliance checks (see notes on FedRAMP for regulated buyers).
- Multi-CDN with centralized steering: Use DNS or managed steering solutions to switch between CDNs with a single control plane and complement with edge caching strategies.
- Edge compute fallback: Deploy read-only fallbacks (edge workers) that serve stale content when origin and CDN both fail.
- Automatic rollback thresholds: Set RUM/metrics thresholds that trigger automatic rollbacks. Keep thresholds conservative to avoid flip-flopping; design your telemetry to feed into predictive systems like those described in predictive monitoring workflows.
Post-incident: learn and harden
After the incident, complete a blameless postmortem with these concrete outputs:
- Timeline of automated steps and approvals (CI logs, audit trails).
- Which automated actions worked and which required manual intervention.
- Action items: reduce TTLs for critical records, add more targeted purge endpoints, increase synthetic monitors, or add secondary origins.
"Automate only what you trust — and design your runbooks so that trust can be tested and measured."
Checklist — Build a battle-tested CDN/DNS incident runbook
- Store runbooks as code in Git (Terraform + Ansible examples folder)
- Pre-create health checks and secondary origins
- Set incident-mode TTLs (60–120s) and document revert values
- Implement a CI pipeline: plan -> approve -> apply
- Instrument automated rollback thresholds with RUM and synthetic monitors
- Run regular failover drills and keep playbooks up-to-date
Actionable takeaways
- Convert your manual runbooks into IaC + playbooks and keep them in Git for auditability.
- Use short TTLs and backup origins to reduce time-to-failover; test in staging first.
- Automate caches and origin updates with Ansible and provider APIs, but gate global failovers with human approvals. Tie the automation into distributed systems patterns like micro-DC and PDU orchestration where applicable for private-hosted fallbacks.
- Keep a documented rollback path and automatic rollback triggers tied to measurable thresholds.
Further reading and references (2025–2026 context)
Major CDN/DNS incidents in late 2025 and January 2026 reinforced the need for automated runbooks and multi-provider resiliency. If you want to explore real incident reports and postmortems, review provider status pages and public postmortems from Cloudflare, AWS, and others from that window — they contain concrete failure modes you can model in your drills. Also see practical guidance on hardware cost and capacity planning when sizing backups and warm standbys.
Call to action
Start your runbook automation project today: fork a Git repo with the examples above, wire it to your CI with an approval gate, and run a staged failover drill this week. Want a ready-to-run template? Download our curated GitOps runbook starter (Terraform + Ansible + CI) and join the dummies.cloud community workshop where we’ll walk through a live simulated CDN/DNS incident. For hands-on migration tips and realtime alternatives to vendor-hosted control planes, read about running realtime workrooms and non-proprietary architectures at run realtime workrooms without Meta.
Related Reading
- Designing Resilient Operational Dashboards — 2026 Playbook
- Edge Caching Strategies for Cloud‑Quantum Workloads — The 2026 Playbook
- How to Build a Migration Plan to an EU Sovereign Cloud Without Breaking Compliance
- What FedRAMP Approval Means for Platform Purchases
- Do You Have Too Many Solar Apps? A Homeowner’s Checklist to Simplify Your Stack
- How Croatian Hostels, B&Bs and Boutique Hotels Can Win Back Brand-Loyal Travellers
- How to Price Limited Runs vs. Unlimited Posters: Lessons from Auction-Level Discoveries
- How to Launch a Limited-Edition Haircare Box and Drive Repeat Sales
- 3 QA Prompts and Review Workflows to Kill AI Slop in Your Newsletter Copy
Related Topics
dummies
Contributor
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.
Up Next
More stories handpicked for you
Microcations, Pop‑Ups and Cloud Tools: How Small Teams Build High‑Impact Weekend Events in 2026
Legal Protections in Sovereign Clouds: What Contracts and Assurances to Look For
Advanced Strategies: Backup, Retention, and Compliance for Small NGOs (2026)
From Our Network
Trending stories across our publication group